History .--Few provisions of the Bill of Rights grew so directly out of the experience of the colonials as the Fourth Amendment, embodying as it did the protection against the utilization of the ''writs of assistance.'' But while the insistence on freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures as a fundamental right gained expression in the Colonies late and as a result of experience, there was also a rich English experience to draw on. ''Every man's house is his castle'' was a maxim much celebrated in England, as was demonstrated in Semayne's Case, decided in 1603. A civil case of execution of process, Semayne's Case nonetheless recognized the right of the homeowner to defend his house against unlawful entry even by the King's agents, but at the same time recognized the authority of the appropriate officers to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King's process. Most famous of the English cases was Entick v. Carrington, one of a series of civil actions against state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search of materials connected with John Wilkes' polemical pamphlets attacking not only governmental policies but the King himself.   

Entick, an associate of Wilkes, sued because agents had forcibly broken into his house, broken into locked desks and boxes, and seized many printed charts, pamphlets and the like. In an opinion sweeping in terms, the court declared the warrant and the behavior it authorized subversive ''of all the comforts of society,'' and the issuance of a warrant for the seizure of all of a person's papers rather than only those alleged to be criminal in nature ''contrary to the genius of the law of England.'' Besides its general character, said the court, the warrant was bad because it was not issued on a showing of probable cause and no record was required to be made of what had been seized. Entick v. Carrington, the Supreme Court has said, is a ''great judgment,'' ''one of the landmarks of English liberty,'' ''one of the permanent monuments of the British Constitution,'' and a guide to an understanding of what the Framers meant in writing the Fourth Amendment. 

In the colonies, smuggling rather than seditious libel afforded the leading examples of the necessity for protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. In order to enforce the revenue laws, English authorities made use of writs of assistance, which were general warrants authorizing the bearer to enter any house or other place to search for and seize ''prohibited and uncustomed'' goods, and commanding all subjects to assist in these endeavors. The writs once issued remained in force throughout the lifetime of the sovereign and six months thereafter. When, upon the death of George II in 1760, the authorities were required to obtain the issuance of new writs, opposition was led by James Otis, who attacked such writs on libertarian grounds and who asserted the invalidity of the authorizing statutes because they conflicted with English constitutionalism. Otis lost and the writs were issued and utilized, but his arguments were much cited in the colonies not only on the immediate subject but also with regard to judicial review.

www.legaldoug.com   2012

Hi Everybody

The natural tendency of any government, political or religious organization, medical people or an organization with some sort of belief, is to have a free access to a person's home, possessions, children or relatives or your mind and project their beliefs onto the helpless person. These radar surveillance systems are one way of doing this. Since the early 1950's the government will not admit that these systems exist. At one time the Fourth Amendment was recognized as a protection for the American people. The Federal Government will not recognize electronic harassment as a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Everything that I have written here is true.

When researching this subject use the keywords, electronic harassment. Typing the terms, government surveillance, radar, fourth amendment, privacy rights freedom of information act, privacy act, statutes at large, telecommunications act, monitoring rooms, or locations of radar human tracking stations is totally worthless. Writing or calling the FBI, attorney general's office or any law enforcement officer about this subject is also worthless

Written by Douglas J Everman

A Targeted Individual is a person who is under some sort of government, corporate or rogue surveillance. A TI can be viewed on monitoring screens by over the horizon radar devices from thousands of miles away. The first radars were developed in 1934. By the late 1940's the ability of theses radars could illuminate a person on a screen and track them. A computer records your bodies signature and can view what you are looking at and view you. In other words it is the same as connecting a camera to your body. All of your bodily functions can also be monitored. These through wall radars can see you in your home in full color. When the average person hears the word, radar, they think of radar that tracks ships and planes. Since the 1960's every state in the United States had some sort of human tracking radars. As a reference you may look up the term LADS,  (Life Assessment Detection System). This is a short range radar system that tracks people usually on city sidewalks and is used by many police departments. We live in an age grossly exaggerated numerical facts and figures that are reported to the public. As a TI since 1953 I firmly believe that the rounded out number of people who had access to these systems from the early 1950's to the present day is about one million.  I would estimate that about seventy five percent of these monitoring people are non government citizens. A person who wants to work as a monitoring person and view people by using an over the horizon radar can apply for a security clearance at many government corporate, telecommunication or medical facilities. The person is granted immunity from law and the targeted Individual has no legal rights or courts to hear his or her grievances. There are no laws in the US code describing human tracking radar devices or any description at all that these systems even exist. All of your personal records in your house or business can be recorded by these radar devices. Again I would like to state that we live in age of grossly exaggerated misinformation given to the public. All government agencies will report to the public that any surveillance system is used to report crimes and to protect the government. This is true however money deals, falsifying records, personnel vendettas and actions by incompetent monitoring people occur every day. Again there are no laws to protect the average citizen and the description and locations of these systems are never reported to the media if a law is broken. Many monitoring people try to pass themselves off as some sort of a person knowledgeable in behavior modification.

Electronic technicians and engineers can program these radars to produce harassing sounds and noises around a targeted individual as the person works, sleeps walks or is in a remote place such as in an open field. Such noises are described as a tinnitus or ringing in the ears noise and taps on the walls, furniture or appliances of ones homes. Noises can be produced in and around one's car. Many TI's report being electronically paralyzed in their sleep. Even as others hear these noises they forget about them as time passes. People who report this electronic harassment to law enforcement are not listened to and most investigative agencies look for some sort of electronic device that is in or near a person's home or decide that the person is crazy. Again these radars can track a targeted individual from thousands of miles away. Many victims of this electronic harassment have reported medical problems caused by these tracking radars.

Somehow the people who do this get around the Fourth Amendment, Privacy and Civil Rights Laws

There are many people in the government and the private sector who have monitoring access and disagree with electronic harassment however they are not sure about revealing these systems to the media and the public

Once a politician or any other person of wealth sees these systems for the first time, there thoughts are about how to use these to use these systems and the people being viewed to their advantage. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution was written into law to protect the citizens from this type of situation. The attraction to a helpless person's life portrayed on a live monitoring screen is tremendous.

I have experienced electronic harassment since 1953. I am now sixty two years old and the harassment still continues to this day. Someone has written up some type of behavioral profile about me that does not make any sense and has executed this onto my life by means of ringing in the ears and taps or clicking noises on my walls, television or car

Ralph Horine Music Teacher Arlington High School

Indianapolis Indiana 1960-1970

 I was a student at Arlington High School in Indianapolis Indiana from 1964 to 1968. Ralph Horine was my homeroom teacher where attendance was taken and school news was conveyed. Other high schools called this class assembly. He had access to the government people that were monitoring me during my first three years of high school. He as very rude to me and made sure that other students did not like me

David Klinclose was also a teacher at Arlington High School in Indianapolis and gave me a hard time during class when I was seventeen years old

Mike Ramage

Arlington High School 1964-1968 Indianapolis Indiana

Tom Drudge

Arlington High School 1964-1968

Arlington High School 1964-1968

Other Students Who Agreed With Electronic Harassment

Toby Caron 

Kevin Orr

Paul Orr

Paul Gallagher

Tom Pritchett

Valerie H. Bonham

Executive Director

Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues

July 27 2011

On March 1 2011, targeted individuals of electronic harassment were allowed to tell of their harassment before the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues in Washington D.C. The following letter was sent to all who were there by Valerie H. Bonham in this condition. If this lady was given a security clearance and taken into a monitoring room she would be silenced

Congressman Andy Jacobs D.
Indiana 11th Congressional District 1965-1997

Indiana Congressman Andy Jacobs 11th and 10 districts 1964-1997, knew the people who were monitoring and harassing me and would not let me know who they were

Cher

This lady has had surveillance monitoring access since the late 1960's and has viewed me

Frank Sinatra Movies

Many history books and news articles have proven Frank Sinatra's Mafia and CIA connections. His access to these people began in the late 1940's and early 1950's. In the late 1950's Frank Sinatra bought a pipe laying company which did contract work for the city of Chicago. These type of companies have radar telemetry capabilities to check if the pipes are leaking. This gave Frank radar access to other systems. While I went to a catholic grade school in Indianapolis unit 1964, Frank used these systems to view me while I was in class

 At three years old I experienced ringing in the ears from electronic harassment. I was born in 1950 in Dayton Ohio. Around 1952-1953 I remember being in some sort of government hospital either in Southern Ohio or Lexington Kentucky. Fifty years later I found out that psychics were in nearby rooms as me and other children ran through the halls. It is easier to read a child's signature rather than an older person. During this time they found out about the Kennedy assassination in 1963, my hand injury in Vietnam in 1971, the losing of the Vietnam war in 1975 and other political events. These events were portrayed in the early Frank Sinatra movies up until the late 1960's. Frank was not sure if these events were going to happen. The psychics picked up me while watching the news on the television. Both Frank Sinatra movies, Suddenly and Manchurian Candidate referred to the television. These movies were a way of letting out of information of future events of which many could not tell would occur. I am actually happy these movies were made. I was Pidge in the Suddenly movie 1954, the hypnotized soldier in Manchurian Candidate1962 and Frank dying on the railroad tracks in Von Ryan's Express 1965 which represented my hand injury in a tank mine explosion in Vietnam July 16 1971.

Dismissed Lawsuit

Most Human Tracking Microwaves are Radar Based

After three  decades of lawsuits against the government claiming unconstitutional use of mind control against its own citizens, no progress has been made in gaining restitution nor even convincing the courts that such a thing  as the invasion of an individual's mind against his or her will and without his or her knowledge can exist. Previous suits, except for a few MKULTRA cases in which drugs were used against an unwitting subject, have been dismissed as , "nuisance suits." There has been no compensation paid under the Federal Tort Claims Act or any other way for any form of mind control experimentation or operation other than that which included the use of drugs. Perhaps this suit will stand up. Then the problem for justice begins. The courts will not be able to operate the way they are presently operating under an assumption that if there's one body committing a crime, there is only one mind making the decision. When mind control is legally proven in all its forms, the justice system will collapse from the weight of a new paradigm-the new legal fact that there can be many minds in one body ( forms of apparent possession such as DID ) and even forms of "electronic possession" such as what the U.S. Air Force is calling "biological process control.";

This promising case against the USA was filed on April 15 1998 in the court of judge Gladys Kessler, Case Number 1:98CV00939. Deck Type:: Civil General. This case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by the International Committee on Offensive Microwave Weapons

Amber Lynn Porn Star

Her father was in the Air Force and she has some sort of government monitoring access

Andrew  Card

President Bush's White House Chief of Staff  January 20 2001-April 14 2006

Mind Justice.org Cheryl Welsh Director- Protection Lacking For Human Subjects

...Bush's Chief of Staff Andrew Card, directed federal agencies to freeze more than 300 pending regulations issued by the administration of Presidential Bill Clinton. Protection from electronic harassment was referred to in these regulations. The regulations affected areas ranging health and safety to the environment and industry. The delay, Card said, would "ensure that the presidents appointee's have the opportunity to review any new or pending regulations." The process as it turned out, expressly precluded input from average citizens. Inviting such comments, agency officials concluded, would be contrary to public interest,"

Ralph J Temple, 1932-2011, was a well respected ACLU attorney. I was in his house in Washington D.C. in 1972. He had monitoring access and had viewed me and would not help me or tell me which branch of government was harassing me. I do not know if he was silenced or if he just did not like me. His wife Sally, also an attorney did not agree with what was happening to me. Ralph Temple died in Oregon in August 2011

Senator Richard Lugar R Senate Indiana

As a student at Butler University in 1975 I was told by my State and Local government professor, Mr. Comfort, who once worked for Mayor Lugar, that monitoring people had over powered the city government of Indianapolis. Richard Lugar was mayor of Indianapolis in the late 1960's and early 1970's. Mr. Comfort said those people just went into the monitoring room and would not tell anybody what they were doing and that they could not stop them. The majority of my harassment and gang stalking occurred in Indianapolis up until 1991

Congressman Dennis Kucinich D Cleveland Ohio

On January 23 2002 Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced the Space Preservation Act of 2002 to congress. There were no co-sponsors of the bill and it was eventually shelved. The bill was written to protect US citizens from Electronic Harassment. Since the early 1950's to the present, thousands of US citizens have experienced some sort of government sponsored electronic harassment. Their statements were the basis for this bill. Organized stalking was not included in any of these bills.